Page 39 of 86
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:06 pm
by Kimiko
Scy - No need to explain the joke. I meant 'adulterated' as a reference to 'adultery'. I understand perfectly well what the word means, silly.
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:33 am
by noodles
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:36 am
by Isabelyes
No their indian stewpit
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:42 pm
by eharper256
My new desktop (spoilered for maybe NSFW):
[spoiler]
Luvia is made of ojou-sama, and <3
Though I didn't put much actual effort into the wall, the vector makes up for it (originally created from as a basis for the vector)
[/spoiler]
Yup, it's everyone's favourite wrestling thaumaturgist, whee!
Vectoring this took me far, far too much time (about 5 hours!), but it was totally worth the output, IMHO.
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:13 am
by Isabelyes
Looks nice.
Also, don't worry, it's not NSFW at all.
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:55 am
by noodles
you may want to examine it closer
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:02 pm
by Isabelyes
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:11 pm
by Maxine MagicFox
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:19 pm
by Isabelyes
Surprise: I still don't see what you're getting at. :3
But, that's because the hand is made almost invisible due to the dress.
Using my perverted mind, I came (...) up with the following possibilities:
- She's holding a dildo. -> This still shouldn't be considered NSFW.
- She's just scratching her ass. -> Though somewhat disturbing, not NSFW.
- She's actually a trap, and she is holding her penis in a quite...peculiar, backwards way. -> I don't see no dick -> not NSFW.
...Yeah, I feel really dumb. But, please, enlighten me as to what is so horrible about her hand.
Also, clicking on the image, I could clearly see her nipples.
Those might be considered NSFW, yes, but I wouldn't for the life of me know what is wrong with her hand.
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:52 pm
by scy
...yeah, I don't follow the logic that makes it NSFW.
Then again, my normal "NSFW?" thoughts is pretty much blatant nudity so...
I'd like to note her hand is on her upper thigh. Check the original image. That image itself (nipples visible) is arguably NSFW but the desktop one really isn't.
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:07 pm
by eharper256
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:30 pm
by Twat
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:39 pm
by noodles
THE CLOTHES ARE TRANSPARENT
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:40 pm
by Isabelyes
Well, that's settled, then -> the pic is not NSFW.
Anyway, I recently bought the first of two Chobits Omnibuses. -> Book 1.
I love it; it's so adorable. The art is beautiful, the story is interesting and somewhat fast-paced without you noticing it...
I read through all 735 pages of divine goodness in three hours.
Can't wait till the second, and last, book comes out! :3
I'm thinking of buying the Artbook "Chobits: Your Eyes Only" from Amazon.
...even though I've already downloaded it and have one of the pics as my background, like, right now.
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:47 pm
by noodles
wait, you've never seen/read chobits?
how cute :3c